English and Irish legal systems

Common Law and Civil Law: Origins, Structures, and Key Differences

1. Common Law vs. Civil Law: Core Characteristics

Common Law

The common law system extends beyond Ireland and England. It represents a legal mentality adopted by more than one-third of the world's countries, largely through British colonialism, with the United States being the most prominent example.

At its core, common law is not codified. It operates through a duality of sources: law emerges from either Parliament (statutory law) or judges (case law). This reflects a fundamental difference in legal culture. In common law countries, the doctrine of precedent is central: rulings made by judges in earlier cases (precedents) have a binding effect on future decisions. Finding the right precedent can effectively determine the judge's decision in a current case.

The approach to law in common law systems is fact-driven. Rather than starting with abstract principles, judges and lawyers begin with the specific facts of a case and search for precedents that closely match those facts. If no relevant precedent exists, the judge must create one. This results in a legal system that is fragmentary and specific, rather than systematic and abstract—often compared to an "English garden" in its organic, case-by-case development.

The career path of judges also reflects this system's uniqueness. In English-speaking countries, individuals become judges late in life, typically after a successful career as a barrister. This ensures that top judges have extensive practical experience, which is crucial because they not only apply the law but actively create it through their interpretations and rulings.

The adversarial procedure is another hallmark of common law. Each party presents its version of the truth and attempts to convince the judge. Witnesses testify, and cross-examination is used to challenge opposing testimony. The judge acts as an umpire, intervening only to rule on objections or procedural matters. This contrasts sharply with the inquisitorial procedure in civil law systems, where judges take an active role in uncovering the truth.

Civil Law

Civil law is closely associated with Roman law and dominates continental Europe. At its heart lies codification: law is contained in comprehensive, systematic codes that establish general and abstract principles. These codes are created by Parliament, and judges merely apply them—they do not create new law.

In civil law systems, the legal process is structured and hierarchical. The law is organized to reflect its Roman roots, emphasizing clarity, logic, and predictability. Judges and lawyers follow separate career paths from the beginning, and judges lack the law-making power of their common law counterparts.

2. Common Law and Equity: Historical Evolution and Key Principles

Origins of Common Law

The common law tradition emerged after the Norman Conquest of England in 1066, when William the Conqueror, Duke of Normandy, established control. At that time, England lacked a centralized court system—justice was administered locally, with courts enforcing local customs.

The transformation occurred under Henry II (reigned 1154–1189), William the Conqueror's grandson. Frustrated by the fragmented legal landscape, Henry II sent judges throughout the kingdom to gather local customs and identify common norms. This process created common law—a unified set of legal principles applied nationwide. Henry II is often called the "father of common law" for this achievement.

By the late 12th century, centralized common law courts were established:

• Exchequer (for tax disputes),
• Common Pleas (for disputes between private parties),
• King's Bench (for disputes involving the Crown).

In 1171, the English imposed common law on Ireland, which then developed its own version of the system while following the same underlying logic.

Emergence of Equity

Despite its strengths, common law's rigidity sometimes led to unfair outcomes. By the late 14th century, those who could not find justice in common law courts began to petition the King directly. This gave rise to Equity, a parallel set of legal rules designed to address common law's limitations.

The Court of Chancery, presided over by the Lord Chancellor, became the primary venue for Equity cases. Equity introduced flexibility where common law was too harsh, particularly in economic matters. Two key areas influenced by Equity are:

• Trust law,
• Mortgage law.

Equity is guided by equitable maxims, principles that reflect its distinct approach:

• "He who seeks equity must do equity" (fairness must be reciprocal),
• "He who comes to equity must come with clean hands" (courts may refuse to help someone who has acted in bad faith),
• "Delay defeats equity" (unreasonable delays can bar relief).

In 1873 (England) and 1877 (Ireland), the separate court systems for common law and Equity merged into a single system with the creation of the High Court and the Court of Appeal. Today, Equity remains a distinct subject but is enforced by the same courts that handle common law.

Key Point: In common law systems, an Act of Parliament is a statute, while judges create or interpret rules through their decisions. This creates a balance between statutory law and judge-made law, reflecting the common law tradition's dynamic nature.

...