Farhenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury
Commentaire d'oeuvre : Farhenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury. Recherche parmi 302 000+ dissertationsPar Lks77_9 • 2 Juin 2025 • Commentaire d'oeuvre • 622 Mots (3 Pages) • 32 Vues
Farhenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury
Preparation file CORRECTION
On the site SPARKNOTES: click on Study Guide and then on characters
Guy Montag: analyse his name, analyse the character and compare him to Winston Smith
Guy = anybody
Montag =after a paper- manufacturing society
It is a far from perfect character, not really heroic but rather clumsy – weak
Not an iconic hero just like WS
Rebellious but without being fully aware of it
Mildred Montag: read her portrait and find similarities with 1984
Dehumanized character – obsessed with television – brainwashed by television –
Deep isolation of the characters : GM = no support from his wife
In 1984, the dictatorship aims at suppressing any intimate relationship thus ensuring the isolation of the citizens
Captain Beatty: read his paragraph and find the ambiguous aspects (does he remind you of anybody?)
Ambiguous (like BB)
Hard to understand what he feels but as a character, he acts like Syme = he gives all the necessary explanations
Click on questions and answers:
Why can’t Montag and Mildred remember how they met? Can you draw a parallel with 1984?
Indifference to the past – indifference to the relationships
People are being constantly distracted so no deep relationship
Everybody remains superficial
A sort of thought control (Thought Police)
Why are people violent in Fahrenheit 451?
Unsatisfaction / frustration / anger / unhappiness
Why were books banned?
They threatened to undermine the ideal of happiness by introducing unnecessary complexity and contradiction into people’s lives
The reason to destroy books is that it is good for society
To suppress potential anger / fear / awareness
People will know only what they hear or see on TV = censorship
- Extract
QUESTIONS:
- Pick out phrases showing what the people in this community want in life
They want happiness. (‘be happy’l.6, ‘fun’l.10, for pleasure’l.11)
- Analyse the effect books have on people
They burn books because they don’t want people to be stirred and upset (= bouleversé), worried, upset, troubled, distressed. Books bring knowledge about reality which can be dark and unpleasant (=désagréable)
According to (=selon) this society, books bring division/isolation and discrimination/chaos. By burning books they want to control/soothe/appease/calm down the population.
- Explain the role of the firefighters and why this community burns books
The role of firefighters is to burn books and not to extinguish/put out fires (=éteindre). It is totally paradoxical/contradictory (which is a common feature in dystopia!). They use fire to clean society and people’s minds (another paradox because usually water is used to clean)
- Demonstrate how this community is dystopian
At first sight/glance, the leaders seem to be well-intended (= bien intentionnés)
They appear to want to keep peace by forbidding/prohibiting books. They want to create equality in their society and make its inhabitants happy by avoiding upsetting them. (avoid+V-ING)
...