Tort Law

Tort law is a fundamental aspect of the legal system that addresses issues of civil wrongs and personal injury. In essence, it is concerned with determining legal liability for harm caused by one party to another. The concept of tort law may seem straightforward, but it is a complex area of law that requires a thorough understanding of its principles and nuances. This raises the question: what is tort law and how does it work? In this context, the main objective of this discussion will be to provide an overview of tort law, explore its main components, and examine how it operates within the legal system

I - Torts

Torts are the result of harm caused by one person (or organization) to another.

The victim can sue the tortfeasor. The people or organizations on either side of a lawsuit are called the parties. In a lawsuit, the victim is called the plaintiff. The offender is called the defendant.

Usually, the plaintiff in a lawsuit asks the court to make the defendant pay money to make up for the harm he or she has caused, called damages.

Sometimes the plaintiff also asks the court to order the defendant to stop doing something, such as polluting the water. This is called an injunction.

Tort law is a set of laws applied by civil courts to compensate people who have suffered harm because of the wrongful act of another person.

In effect, tort actions are civil cases, as opposed to criminal cases.

For exemple, In 1994, O.J. Simpson was charged with the murder of his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ron Goldman. O.J. Simpson was found not guilty by a nine-person jury of the criminal charges related to their deaths. However, the family of the deceased filed two civil liability actions, one for wrongful death and the other for battery. Simpson lost that case. Why?

Unlike criminal cases, in tort cases, the plaintiff must prove his or her case by a preponderance of the evidence. This is a much lower burden than the reasonable doubt standard applicable in criminal cases.

II- Classification of offences

Offences can be classified into 4 categories according to the mental state of the perpetrator that may be required to commit the offence.

1- Intentional torts

The first category of offenses is intentional torts. Intentional torts are illegal acts committed intentionally. The law generally provides harsher penalties for intentional offenses.

In the case of an intentional tort, the court orders the defendant to pay damages to the plaintiff.

The 2 best known examples of intentional torts are battery and assault.

Battery is an intentional act of harmful or offensive physical contact, where the intent to harm or offend is taken into account. Offensive contact is judged by the standard of reasonableness.

Assault, on the other hand, is the intentional creation of a reasonable fear of harmful or offensive contact in a person, and does not require actual physical contact.

2- The second category of torts is that of unintentional torts

This 'category' actually includes only one tort, the tort of negligence, in which the tortfeasor acts unintentionally, but causes harm to the victim.

The law of negligence allows a plaintiff to sue the defendant for the harm he or she has caused either by accident or by reckless behaviour.

The four elements a plaintiff must prove to succeed are 1) duty, 2) breach, 3) cause, and 4) injury.

(1)duty :

The first step in analysing a negligence scenario is to determine whether or not the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff.

The first duty is the duty of care to behave as a reasonable person would in similar circumstances. If not, the defendant has breached his duty.

The second duty is a "special duty" imposed by statute or case law, which may be in addition to or instead of the usual duty of care.

(2) Breach of Contract

Once you have determined the existence of a duty, you must determine whether the defendant has breached its duty. A defendant may breach by acting in a certain way or by failing to act in a certain way.

(3) Cause,

Once you have shown that the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff and that the defendant breached that duty, you must show that the breach was the actual and proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury.

(4) Prejudice

Finally, you must show that the plaintiff suffered harm as a result of the defendant's breach. If the plaintiff does not suffer harm, he or she cannot speak of negligence.

Scope of liability

The scope of liability is a legal concept used in tort law. It involves determining the extent of liability of a defendant (tortfeasor) for damages caused to a plaintiff (claimant).

The scope of liability may be limited by several factors, such as causation, foreseeability of damage, the extent of the risk zone and the fault of the victim. Courts take these factors into account when deciding whether and to what extent a defendant is liable for damages suffered by a plaintiff.

Negligence per se

Negligence per se" is a legal concept which allows that if a person violates a law or regulation intended to protect others and that violation causes harm, that person can be considered negligent without having to prove that he or she acted recklessly or negligently. Indeed, the violation of the law or regulation in itself establishes the person's negligence.

Res ipsa Loquitur

Res ipsa loquitur is a Latin phrase that translates as "the thing speaks for itself". It is a legal doctrine that allows a plaintiff in a lawsuit to establish a presumption of negligence on the part of the defendant without having to provide specific evidence of the defendant's negligence. Res ipsa loquitur is often used in cases where it may be difficult for the plaintiff to prove exactly how the damage occurred.

3-

...